Introduction
hair is a 1968 adaptation of the off-Broadway musical of the same name that captures the countercultural atmosphere of the time. It revolves around a farm boy named Claude from Oklahoma, who travels to New York City to join the army and encounters a group of eccentric hippies led by Berger.
Controversial Reception
Hair immediately gained attention and controversy due to its disobedient approach, use of explicit language, and nudity. Its political content explores themes of racism, discrimination, war pollution, and sexual repression, leading to bans in many cities and protests from churches and officials.
Countercultural Spirit
The musical satirizes organized religion and challenges the concept of God, depicting it as false and empty. It also raises questions about Berger’s search for love, comparing it to the search for the Virgin Mary. Creators James Rado and Gerome Ragni aimed to capture the countercultural spirit of their time through the characters of Claude and Berger and recruited original cast members at social gatherings.
Story Synopsis
hair follows Claude, an unknowing farm boy from Oklahoma, who travels to New York City before his army induction. He becomes involved with Sheila and Berger’s tribe of hippies, discovering drugs, such as marijuana and LSD, and practicing draft dodging. With the war looming, they find ways to cope.
Relevance Today
Hair remains relevant today as it addresses workplace bias that Black women face regarding their natural Hair. The movie adaptation takes a stand against this injustice.
Performances
The film adaptation of hair stays faithful to its source material while surprising audiences with unexpected plot twists and character development. Director Milos Forman and screenwriter Michael Weller create a unique cinematic experience. The characters’ portrayal is based on real people, inspired by Aquarius gatherings and Twyla Tharp’s choreography.
Impact and Reception
Although hair premiered on Broadway in 1967 and garnered attention during the Summer of Love, it was only fully appreciated as a significant work of art once the movie version was released 12 years later. While the movie omits some emotionally charged moments and choreography, it effectively captures the essence of the original musical.
Conclusion
hair breaks free from its musical roots while maintaining familiarity and predictability. The film avoids stereotypical imagery of the hippie movement and explores discoveries. While some characters may seem underwritten, the actors find emotional depth, and the essence of the musical shines through on-screen.
